http://revenuewatch.org/EITIreports
2009
Report Quality Analysis
Report Compiled by Fair Links
EITI report Download PDF
Source mete.gov.al
Company Payments
Government Receipts
GDP, 2009 BILLION $ source
Total Government Revenue (% of GDP)
Reported EI Revenue
(% of Total Revenue)
Commodity | EITI Production Volumes | Units | Indep. Source Production Volumes | Units | Price from EITI Report | Per Unit | Indep. Reference Price | Per Unit | Total Company Payments | Total Gov't Receipts | Notes |
Oil | 3,467,500 | bbls | 1,975,015 | bbls 1 | 61.66 | 2 | $31,903,000 | $31,300,000 | 3 | ||
Mining | $2,017,895 | $1,958,947 |
Report Quality Indicators | ||
1. Regularity | ||
a) score | 1.00 | |
b) total reports / implementing years | 1/1 | |
2. Timeliness | ||
Lag between fiscal year of data and publication year. | 2 | |
3. Materiality | ||
Report clearly defines a materiality threshold. | No | The production threshold at which mining companies were selected is included. The materiality threshold for revenues is cited, but not defined. |
4. Data Reliability | ||
Report contains audited data from: | ||
a) companies | No | Only data from one company, Bankers Petroleum, is audited. |
b) government | No | |
5. Coverage | ||
Revenue data includes the following revenue streams: | ||
a) royalties | Yes | |
b) taxes | Yes | |
c) surface, rental or license fees | Yes | |
d) bonuses | Yes | |
e) state-owned enterprise (SOE) payments | Yes | |
f) Report covers all extractive sector companies. | No | All oil companies (9 of 9) reported. 32 of 37 mining companies reported. Total: 41 of 46 companies reported. |
g) Report states the price of any product received or sold by government. | No | |
h) Report states the quantity of resources produced. | Yes | Oil production quantities are included, mining production figures are not. |
6. Discrepancies | ||
Report contains: | ||
a) information on the cause of revenue discrepancies. | No | There is information about royalty discrepancies, but not other revenue streams. |
b) reconciled data following the correction of discrepancies. | Yes | Unclear whether the government submitted corrected data. |
7. SOE Revenue Flow | ||
SOE Revenue Flow data is clearly explained in the report. | Yes | |
8. Disaggregation | ||
Report provides financial data on individual: | ||
a) companies | No | |
b) revenue streams | Yes | |
c) projects | No | |
d) commodities | No | Oil and mining revenues are reported separately, but mining revenues are not broken down by commodity. |
9. Comprehensibility | ||
Report contains: | ||
a) a summary with key findings and revenue totals | No | |
b) clear indication of what currencies and units of measurement are used | Yes | |
c) written explanation of key findings and recommendations | Yes | |
d) a clear definition of terms | Yes | |
10. Accessibility | ||
Report is available: | ||
a) in at least one official language | Yes | |
b) on a government website | Yes | |
Related Indicators | ||
Revenue Watch Index, | N/A | |
Corruption Perception Index, 2010 | 87/178 | |
Open Budget Survey, 2010 | 33 |
Download and save the current view as a CSV/Excel file, or print this view using the print button above. (To save page with full layout, please select print and choose any available option to print as a PDF file.)